No one likes to get rejected, no matter what the cause.Β But remember those dates when that great guy (or gal) didn’t call back and you never understood what went wrong?Β Or the job interview you thought was in the bag that you didn’t get?Β Or yes, the manuscript you were so certain of… Sometimes, all we want is the “why.”Β Β And Angela James at Carina Press has offered a few answers. For the manuscript rejections, at least… There isn’t enough space on this blog to discuss why men don’t call, but this list sort of does read like the editor’s version of “We’re Just Not That Into You.”
These posts are terrific – she has provided one with snippets of rejection reasons as well as ones with snippets of acceptance reasons.Β So let’s compare:
The full rejection post is here.
Here are the top reasons:
1.Β Β Β The manuscript doesnβt catch the readerβs attention from the start.
2.Β Β Β The story doesnβt stand out as fresh or unique.
3.Β Β Β The author has included too many unimportant details and not enough important details
4.Β Β Β The writing just isnβt there
5.Β Β Β The voice of the manuscript/characters doesnβt work
6.Β Β Β The reader canβt connect to the characters, theyβre not fully realized or believable
7.Β Β Β The story requires too much suspension of disbelief
8.Β Β Β The manuscript starts well but doesnβt follow through
9.Β Β Β Unnecessary subplots
10.Β Β Β The conflict wasnβt sustainable
(read the specific editor comments on the blog post)
To me, the great thing about this rejection list is that all of those can be WORKED on.Β Yes, writing is a craft… it’s a learning process.Β Sometimes, it’s a matter of knowing exactly what you need to work on that can be the difficult part.Β If you look at “the writing just isn’t there” — that is not saying that this writer can’t write, it’s saying that they have more to learn.Β Β In fact, everything on this list provides a jumping point for delving deeper into the work of writing.Β Β Rejection is never fun, but if you look at it properly, it can provide you with the map to get to exactly where you want to be.
If you look at the “opposite of rejection” post, these are the reasons for acceptance:
1. Original story concept
2. Characters they can relate to, fall in love with, want to read about
3. Pacing that keeps them turning the pages
4. Developed world building
5. Skillfully told story that intersperses backstory
6. Sustainable conflict
7. Any and all of the above
(and again, read the specific editor comments on the blog post)
If you read the lists above and read the editors remarks, did anything resonate with you as an area you need to focus on?
As I’m planning the year ahead for Happy Endings, what guests to bring, what topics to focus on and the next workshop to consider,Β here is my question to you. Which of these above would really help you to understand better?Β Β Do you need to know more about world building?Β Or about sustaining conflict?Β Writing compelling characters?Β Or all of the above?
5 comments
Nice way to turn it around, Jeannie. The positive always looks better than the negative. If I had to pick an area I need to study more, it would be secondary arcs. How to weave in secondary character stories and make them compelling, but not enough to draw attention from the H/H arcs.
Thanks for the post, Jeannie. And thanks for asking.
Always nice to hear things like this directly from the source, Jeannie! As I’m facing a major rewrite to cut backstory and weave it back in skillfully (and hopefully seamlessly), I’d really like some advice on that. A friend is having trouble writing action scenes–they’re too long and bogging down her story. That might be an interesting subject to touch on as well.
Hey Laurie — Thanks! I’m a glass-half-full kinda gal. LOL
Funny you mention secondary arcs. Larry Brooks at Storyfix.com has a post about subplots today…definitely worth a read: http://storyfix.com/the-thing-about-sub-plots
But I agree, especially in romances, adding in the subplots to a romance without overtaking it can be tough. You want it to add meaning to the romance. Usually how I look at it is that the subplot should have something to do with the hero or heroine’s personal journey through the story. That always works as a good connection for me.
Great topic — I’ve added it to my topics list and will go forth with finding experts to discuss it. LOL
When I went to a recent workshop given by Donald Maass, he made it beyond clear that he HATED backstory. In fact, I would venture to say it was a bad word as far as he’s concerned. LOL But there are always elements of “what happened before this” that need to come into the story, so yes, weaving them in is something we all need to understand better. Added to my list (along with action scenes) for upcoming topics. π
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by ElizabethSCraig: Top reasons for rejection…and acceptance: http://tinyurl.com/y9szdhf…